ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) vs Norway: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201)
99.1%
in 2024
Norway
103.8%
in 2024
ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) rank
56th
Norway rank
54th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201)
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 103.8% against 99.1% in ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201), a difference of 4.7%.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) ranks 56th and Norway ranks 54th of 221 groups.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.9% | 98.7% | 6.8% | Norway |
| 2010s | 94.2% | 102.1% | 7.8% | Norway |
| 2020s | 98.4% | 105.3% | 6.9% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) or Norway?
- Norway, at 103.8% against 99.1% in ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) and Norway?
- 4.7%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) and Norway?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) and Norway rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- ECE: Cis (cwg) (unsdcode:98201) ranks 56th and Norway ranks 54th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release