ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
59.8%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
69.2%
in 2013
ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) rank
163rd
Zimbabwe rank
163rd

Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time

  • ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
  • Zimbabwe
020406080199720082019

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 69.2% against 59.8% in ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427), a difference of 9.4%.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1999 it was ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) ahead.

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) ranks 163rd and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 221 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 58.9% 56.9% 2.0% ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
2000s 60.3% 61.9% 1.5% Zimbabwe
2010s 70.8% 69.8% 0.9% ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 69.2% against 59.8% in ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) as of 2013.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) and Zimbabwe?
9.4%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) and Zimbabwe?
7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2013.
How do ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) ranks 163rd and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/escap-pacific-island-developing-economies-pide-unsdcode-98427/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/escap-pacific-island-developing-economies-pide-unsdcode-98427/zimbabwe/">ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,391 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release