Kiribati vs UIS: Central Asia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
Kiribati
100.0%
in 2024
UIS: Central Asia
95.5%
in 2024
Kiribati rank
78th
UIS: Central Asia rank
75th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- Kiribati
- UIS: Central Asia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 100.0% against 95.5% in UIS: Central Asia, a difference of 4.5%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1998 it was UIS: Central Asia ahead.
Kiribati ranks 78th and UIS: Central Asia ranks 75th of 199 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 3 and UIS: Central Asia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | UIS: Central Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 39.8% | 80.1% | 40.3% | UIS: Central Asia |
| 2000s | 92.9% | 91.0% | 1.9% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 104.4% | 93.0% | 11.4% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 101.5% | 92.7% | 8.8% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Kiribati or UIS: Central Asia?
- Kiribati, at 100.0% against 95.5% in UIS: Central Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Kiribati and UIS: Central Asia?
- 4.5%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and UIS: Central Asia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and UIS: Central Asia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- Kiribati ranks 78th and UIS: Central Asia ranks 75th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release