Latvia vs WB: Ibrd Only: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
Latvia
100.7%
in 2024
WB: Ibrd Only
96.6%
in 2024
Latvia rank
71st
WB: Ibrd Only rank
71st
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- Latvia
- WB: Ibrd Only
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 100.7% against 96.6% in WB: Ibrd Only, a difference of 4.1%.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 71st and WB: Ibrd Only ranks 71st of 199 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | WB: Ibrd Only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 101.1% | 85.5% | 15.7% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 103.1% | 94.9% | 8.2% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 100.5% | 96.8% | 3.7% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Latvia or WB: Ibrd Only?
- Latvia, at 100.7% against 96.6% in WB: Ibrd Only as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Latvia and WB: Ibrd Only?
- 4.1%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and WB: Ibrd Only?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and WB: Ibrd Only rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- Latvia ranks 71st and WB: Ibrd Only ranks 71st of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release