MDG: Developed Regions vs Namibia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
MDG: Developed Regions
102.7%
in 2024
Namibia
107.8%
in 2024
MDG: Developed Regions rank
31st
Namibia rank
33rd
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- MDG: Developed Regions
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 107.8% against 102.7% in MDG: Developed Regions, a difference of 5.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1999 it was MDG: Developed Regions ahead.
MDG: Developed Regions ranks 31st and Namibia ranks 33rd of 221 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, MDG: Developed Regions averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | MDG: Developed Regions | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.9% | 84.9% | 16.0% | MDG: Developed Regions |
| 2000s | 100.6% | 87.4% | 13.2% | MDG: Developed Regions |
| 2010s | 101.5% | 102.6% | 1.0% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 103.0% | 108.7% | 5.7% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, MDG: Developed Regions or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 107.8% against 102.7% in MDG: Developed Regions as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between MDG: Developed Regions and Namibia?
- 5.1%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for MDG: Developed Regions and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
- How do MDG: Developed Regions and Namibia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- MDG: Developed Regions ranks 31st and Namibia ranks 33rd of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release