MDG: Oceania vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
MDG: Oceania
59.8%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
69.2%
in 2013
MDG: Oceania rank
161st
Zimbabwe rank
163rd
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- MDG: Oceania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 69.2% against 59.8% in MDG: Oceania, a difference of 9.4%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times MDG: Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1999 it was MDG: Oceania ahead.
MDG: Oceania ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 221 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, MDG: Oceania averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | MDG: Oceania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 58.9% | 56.9% | 2.0% | MDG: Oceania |
| 2000s | 60.4% | 61.9% | 1.5% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 70.8% | 69.8% | 1.0% | MDG: Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, MDG: Oceania or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 69.2% against 59.8% in MDG: Oceania as of 2013.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between MDG: Oceania and Zimbabwe?
- 9.4%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for MDG: Oceania and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2013.
- How do MDG: Oceania and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- MDG: Oceania ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release