Naoero vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female

Naoero
101.4%
in 2025
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
97.1%
in 2024
Naoero rank
68th
UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank
68th

Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time

  • Naoero
  • UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
0255075100199420092025

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 101.4% against 97.1% in UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries, a difference of 4.3%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1998 it was UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ahead.

Naoero ranks 68th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 68th of 199 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Naoero averaged higher in 1 and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Naoero UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries Difference Ahead
1990s 59.8% 73.0% 13.1% UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
2000s 60.9% 85.6% 24.7% UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
2010s 82.0% 94.8% 12.8% UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries
2020s 97.1% 96.7% 0.4% Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Naoero or UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
Naoero, at 101.4% against 97.1% in UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Naoero and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
4.3%, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries?
12 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
How do Naoero and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
Naoero ranks 68th and UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries ranks 68th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Naoero vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/naoero/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/naoero/unicef-east-asia-and-the-pacific-programme-countries/">Naoero vs UNICEF: East Asia and the Pacific Programme Countries: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,391 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release