Naoero vs WB: Ibrd Only: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
Naoero
101.4%
in 2025
WB: Ibrd Only
96.6%
in 2024
Naoero rank
68th
WB: Ibrd Only rank
71st
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- Naoero
- WB: Ibrd Only
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 101.4% against 96.6% in WB: Ibrd Only, a difference of 4.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1998 it was WB: Ibrd Only ahead.
Naoero ranks 68th and WB: Ibrd Only ranks 71st of 199 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Naoero averaged higher in 1 and WB: Ibrd Only in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | WB: Ibrd Only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 59.8% | 72.9% | 13.1% | WB: Ibrd Only |
| 2000s | 60.9% | 82.7% | 21.8% | WB: Ibrd Only |
| 2010s | 82.0% | 95.1% | 13.1% | WB: Ibrd Only |
| 2020s | 97.1% | 96.7% | 0.3% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Naoero or WB: Ibrd Only?
- Naoero, at 101.4% against 96.6% in WB: Ibrd Only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Naoero and WB: Ibrd Only?
- 4.8%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and WB: Ibrd Only?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do Naoero and WB: Ibrd Only rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- Naoero ranks 68th and WB: Ibrd Only ranks 71st of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release