SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female

SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)
59.8%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
69.2%
in 2013
SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) rank
161st
Zimbabwe rank
163rd

Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time

  • SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)
  • Zimbabwe
020406080199720082019

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 69.2% against 59.8% in SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 9.4%.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1999 it was SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) ahead.

SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 221 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 58.9% 56.9% 2.0% SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)
2000s 60.4% 61.9% 1.5% Zimbabwe
2010s 70.8% 69.8% 1.0% SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 69.2% against 59.8% in SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) as of 2013.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) and Zimbabwe?
9.4%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) and Zimbabwe?
7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2013.
How do SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/sdg-oceania-excluding-australia-and-new-zealand/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/sdg-oceania-excluding-australia-and-new-zealand/zimbabwe/">SDG: Oceania (excluding Australia and New Zealand) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,391 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release