Caribbean Small States vs Thailand: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- Caribbean Small States
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 114.7% against 93.7% in Caribbean Small States, a difference of 21.0%.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.2 times Caribbean Small States's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Caribbean Small States ahead.
Caribbean Small States ranks 20th and Thailand ranks 16th of 45 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Caribbean Small States averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean Small States | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.7% | 87.2% | 8.5% | Caribbean Small States |
| 2010s | 94.6% | 108.4% | 13.9% | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Caribbean Small States or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 114.7% against 93.7% in Caribbean Small States as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Caribbean Small States and Thailand?
- 21.0%, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean Small States and Thailand?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
- How do Caribbean Small States and Thailand rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- Caribbean Small States ranks 20th and Thailand ranks 16th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.