Cayman Islands vs Myanmar: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
Cayman Islands
83.7%
in 2018
Myanmar
77.5%
in 2018
Cayman Islands rank
136th
Myanmar rank
139th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- Cayman Islands
- Myanmar
How they compare
Cayman Islands currently reports 83.7% against 77.5% in Myanmar, a difference of 6.2%.
That makes Cayman Islands's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Cayman Islands has been ahead every year.
Cayman Islands ranks 136th and Myanmar ranks 139th of 188 countries.
Cayman Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 95.4% | 35.4% | 60.0% | Cayman Islands |
| 2000s | 88.2% | 46.8% | 41.4% | Cayman Islands |
| 2010s | 83.7% | 77.5% | 6.2% | Cayman Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Cayman Islands or Myanmar?
- Cayman Islands, at 83.7% against 77.5% in Myanmar as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Cayman Islands and Myanmar?
- 6.2%, with Cayman Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Myanmar?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Cayman Islands and Myanmar rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- Cayman Islands ranks 136th and Myanmar ranks 139th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.