Early-demographic dividend vs Namibia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- Early-demographic dividend
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 109.7% against 86.9% in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 22.8%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Early-demographic dividend's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Early-demographic dividend ranks 26th and Namibia ranks 28th of 45 groups.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Early-demographic dividend | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 59.5% | 75.5% | 16.0% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 69.0% | 88.4% | 19.5% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 83.3% | 100.5% | 17.2% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Early-demographic dividend or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 109.7% against 86.9% in Early-demographic dividend as of 2017.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Early-demographic dividend and Namibia?
- 22.8%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do Early-demographic dividend and Namibia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- Early-demographic dividend ranks 26th and Namibia ranks 28th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.