Lesotho vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- Lesotho
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 84.3% against 82.6% in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 1.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
Lesotho ranks 135th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 137th of 188 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 40.8% | 78.1% | 37.4% | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2000s | 50.5% | 86.3% | 35.8% | Turks and Caicos Islands |
| 2010s | 80.5% | 68.1% | 12.5% | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Lesotho or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Lesotho, at 84.3% against 82.6% in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2017.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Lesotho and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 1.7%, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2015.
- How do Lesotho and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- Lesotho ranks 135th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 137th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.