Libya vs New Zealand: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
Libya
103.0%
in 2006
New Zealand
102.5%
in 2018
Libya rank
58th
New Zealand rank
61st
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- Libya
- New Zealand
How they compare
Libya currently reports 103.0% against 102.5% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 58th and New Zealand ranks 61st of 188 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Libya or New Zealand?
- Libya, at 103.0% against 102.5% in New Zealand as of 2006.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Libya and New Zealand?
- 0.5%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2006.
- How do Libya and New Zealand rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- Libya ranks 58th and New Zealand ranks 61st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.