Low & middle income vs Namibia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
Low & middle income
81.9%
in 2019
Namibia
109.7%
in 2017
Low & middle income rank
31st
Namibia rank
28th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- Low & middle income
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 109.7% against 81.9% in Low & middle income, a difference of 27.8%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Low & middle income's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Low & middle income ranks 31st and Namibia ranks 28th of 43 groups.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low & middle income | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.3% | 75.5% | 11.2% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 71.7% | 88.4% | 16.7% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 80.0% | 100.5% | 20.5% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Low & middle income or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 109.7% against 81.9% in Low & middle income as of 2017.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Low & middle income and Namibia?
- 27.8%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do Low & middle income and Namibia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- Low & middle income ranks 31st and Namibia ranks 28th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.