Low income vs Macau, China: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
Low income
44.1%
in 2018
Macau, China
105.7%
in 2019
Low income rank
45th
Macau, China rank
43rd
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- Low income
- Macau, China
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 105.7% against 44.1% in Low income, a difference of 61.6%.
That makes Macau, China's figure about 2.4 times Low income's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.
Low income ranks 45th and Macau, China ranks 43rd of 45 groups.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.3% | 100.7% | 76.4% | Macau, China |
| 2000s | 32.1% | 101.0% | 68.8% | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 43.4% | 103.7% | 60.4% | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Low income or Macau, China?
- Macau, China, at 105.7% against 44.1% in Low income as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Low income and Macau, China?
- 61.6%, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Macau, China?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Low income and Macau, China rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- Low income ranks 45th and Macau, China ranks 43rd of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.