Low income vs Malta: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female
Low income
44.1%
in 2018
Malta
105.1%
in 2018
Low income rank
43rd
Malta rank
46th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female over time
- Low income
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 105.1% against 44.1% in Low income, a difference of 61.0%.
That makes Malta's figure about 2.4 times Low income's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Low income ranks 43rd and Malta ranks 46th of 43 groups.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.3% | 99.2% | 74.9% | Malta |
| 2000s | 32.1% | 101.2% | 69.1% | Malta |
| 2010s | 43.4% | 103.1% | 59.8% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female, Low income or Malta?
- Malta, at 105.1% against 44.1% in Low income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female between Low income and Malta?
- 61.0%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Malta?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
- How do Low income and Malta rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female?
- Low income ranks 43rd and Malta ranks 46th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.