AIMS: Central Asia vs New Zealand: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
AIMS: Central Asia
97.2%
in 2024
New Zealand
101.8%
in 2024
AIMS: Central Asia rank
61st
New Zealand rank
64th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 101.8% against 97.2% in AIMS: Central Asia, a difference of 4.6%.
Across all 25 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 61st and New Zealand ranks 64th of 221 groups.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.3% | 103.7% | 8.3% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 95.2% | 102.4% | 7.2% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 94.5% | 102.1% | 7.7% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, AIMS: Central Asia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 101.8% against 97.2% in AIMS: Central Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between AIMS: Central Asia and New Zealand?
- 4.6%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and New Zealand?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and New Zealand rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 61st and New Zealand ranks 64th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release