AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific vs Latvia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
97.1%
in 2024
Latvia
101.6%
in 2024
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific rank
67th
Latvia rank
66th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 101.6% against 97.1% in AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific, a difference of 4.5%.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 67th and Latvia ranks 66th of 221 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.1% | 104.8% | 14.7% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 93.9% | 106.1% | 12.2% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 96.6% | 101.3% | 4.6% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 101.6% against 97.1% in AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Latvia?
- 4.5%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific and Latvia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- AIMS: East Asia and the Pacific ranks 67th and Latvia ranks 66th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release