AIMS: East Asia vs Latvia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
AIMS: East Asia
97.2%
in 2024
Latvia
101.6%
in 2024
AIMS: East Asia rank
63rd
Latvia rank
66th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- AIMS: East Asia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 101.6% against 97.2% in AIMS: East Asia, a difference of 4.4%.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
AIMS: East Asia ranks 63rd and Latvia ranks 66th of 221 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.8% | 104.8% | 15.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 93.6% | 106.1% | 12.5% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 96.7% | 101.3% | 4.5% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, AIMS: East Asia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 101.6% against 97.2% in AIMS: East Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between AIMS: East Asia and Latvia?
- 4.4%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and Latvia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- AIMS: East Asia ranks 63rd and Latvia ranks 66th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release