China vs Latvia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
China
101.4%
in 2012
Latvia
101.6%
in 2024
China rank
68th
Latvia rank
66th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 101.6% against 101.4% in China, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
China ranks 68th and Latvia ranks 66th of 199 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.9% | 104.7% | 8.8% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 102.5% | 108.7% | 6.2% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, China or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 101.6% against 101.4% in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between China and Latvia?
- 0.2%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2012.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- China ranks 68th and Latvia ranks 66th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release