ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) vs Libya: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
99.0%
in 2024
Libya
103.2%
in 2006
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) rank
52nd
Libya rank
55th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408)
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 103.2% against 99.0% in ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408), a difference of 4.2%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ranks 52nd and Libya ranks 55th of 221 groups.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) or Libya?
- Libya, at 103.2% against 99.0% in ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) as of 2006.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Libya?
- 4.2%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Libya?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2006.
- How do ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) and Libya rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- ESCAP: East and North-east Asia (enea) (unsdcode:98408) ranks 52nd and Libya ranks 55th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release