ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) vs Zambia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
66.1%
in 2019
Zambia
70.1%
in 2024
ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) rank
159th
Zambia rank
161st

Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time

  • ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
  • Zambia
020406080199720102024

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 70.1% against 66.1% in ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427), a difference of 4.0%.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1998 it was ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) ahead.

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) ranks 159th and Zambia ranks 161st of 221 groups.

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 66.2% 28.8% 37.4% ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
2000s 71.7% 54.9% 16.9% ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)
2010s 75.7% 67.7% 8.0% ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) or Zambia?
Zambia, at 70.1% against 66.1% in ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) and Zambia?
4.0%, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) and Zambia?
19 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2017.
How do ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) and Zambia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) ranks 159th and Zambia ranks 161st of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) vs Zambia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-male-percent-2/escap-pacific-island-developing-economies-pide-unsdcode-98427/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-male-percent-2/escap-pacific-island-developing-economies-pide-unsdcode-98427/zambia/">ESCAP: Pacific Island Developing Economies (pide) (unsdcode:98427) vs Zambia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,387 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release