SDG: Australia and New Zealand vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male

SDG: Australia and New Zealand
109.9%
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
136.8%
in 2024
SDG: Australia and New Zealand rank
4th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
5th

Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time

  • SDG: Australia and New Zealand
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
050100150199920112024

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 136.8% against 109.9% in SDG: Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 26.9%.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.2 times SDG: Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1999 it was SDG: Australia and New Zealand ahead.

SDG: Australia and New Zealand ranks 4th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 5th of 221 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, SDG: Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade SDG: Australia and New Zealand Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 117.5% 82.6% 34.9% SDG: Australia and New Zealand
2000s 120.4% 92.7% 27.7% SDG: Australia and New Zealand
2010s 122.4% 94.7% 27.7% SDG: Australia and New Zealand
2020s 109.8% 123.5% 13.7% Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, SDG: Australia and New Zealand or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 136.8% against 109.9% in SDG: Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between SDG: Australia and New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands?
26.9%, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for SDG: Australia and New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands?
19 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
How do SDG: Australia and New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
SDG: Australia and New Zealand ranks 4th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 5th of 221 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

SDG: Australia and New Zealand vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-male-percent-2/sdg-australia-and-new-zealand/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-lower-secondary-male-percent-2/sdg-australia-and-new-zealand/turks-and-caicos-islands/">SDG: Australia and New Zealand vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,387 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release