Antigua and Barbuda vs Post-demographic dividend: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Post-demographic dividend
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 124.2% against 103.5% in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 20.7%.
That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.2 times Post-demographic dividend's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Post-demographic dividend ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 8th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 8th of 188 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Post-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 125.1% | 103.2% | 21.9% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 128.4% | 104.0% | 24.4% | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Antigua and Barbuda or Post-demographic dividend?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 124.2% against 103.5% in Post-demographic dividend as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Antigua and Barbuda and Post-demographic dividend?
- 20.7%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Post-demographic dividend?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 8th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 8th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.