Aruba vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Aruba
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 117.3% against 93.8% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 23.5%.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.3 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 21st and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 21st of 188 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 111.5% | 78.1% | 33.4% | Aruba |
| 2000s | 114.3% | 86.9% | 27.4% | Aruba |
| 2010s | 116.5% | 92.1% | 24.4% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Aruba or East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Aruba, at 117.3% against 93.8% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2012.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Aruba and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- 23.5%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2012.
- How do Aruba and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Aruba ranks 21st and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 21st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.