Canada vs Low & middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Canada
109.7%
in 2018
Low & middle income
82.5%
in 2019
Canada rank
30th
Low & middle income rank
30th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Canada
- Low & middle income
How they compare
Canada currently reports 109.7% against 82.5% in Low & middle income, a difference of 27.2%.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.3 times Low & middle income's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 30th and Low & middle income ranks 30th of 188 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Low & middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 103.5% | 71.3% | 32.3% | Canada |
| 2000s | 100.4% | 77.5% | 22.9% | Canada |
| 2010s | 103.1% | 81.5% | 21.7% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Canada or Low & middle income?
- Canada, at 109.7% against 82.5% in Low & middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Canada and Low & middle income?
- 27.2%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Low & middle income?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2018.
- How do Canada and Low & middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Canada ranks 30th and Low & middle income ranks 30th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.