Canada vs Lower middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Canada
109.7%
in 2018
Lower middle income
78.8%
in 2019
Canada rank
30th
Lower middle income rank
34th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Canada
- Lower middle income
How they compare
Canada currently reports 109.7% against 78.8% in Lower middle income, a difference of 30.9%.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.4 times Lower middle income's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 30th and Lower middle income ranks 34th of 188 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Lower middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 103.9% | 64.0% | 39.9% | Canada |
| 2000s | 100.4% | 69.7% | 30.7% | Canada |
| 2010s | 103.1% | 77.5% | 25.6% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Canada or Lower middle income?
- Canada, at 109.7% against 78.8% in Lower middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Canada and Lower middle income?
- 30.9%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Lower middle income?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2018.
- How do Canada and Lower middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Canada ranks 30th and Lower middle income ranks 34th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.