Caribbean Small States vs Tonga: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Caribbean Small States
92.7%
in 2019
Tonga
112.1%
in 2015
Caribbean Small States rank
23rd
Tonga rank
25th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Caribbean Small States
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 112.1% against 92.7% in Caribbean Small States, a difference of 19.4%.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.2 times Caribbean Small States's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Caribbean Small States ranks 23rd and Tonga ranks 25th of 45 groups.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean Small States | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 86.2% | 102.7% | 16.5% | Tonga |
| 2000s | 92.6% | 107.4% | 14.8% | Tonga |
| 2010s | 91.0% | 109.5% | 18.5% | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Caribbean Small States or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 112.1% against 92.7% in Caribbean Small States as of 2015.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Caribbean Small States and Tonga?
- 19.4%, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean Small States and Tonga?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2015.
- How do Caribbean Small States and Tonga rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Caribbean Small States ranks 23rd and Tonga ranks 25th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.