Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Jordan: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
71.7%
in 2015
Jordan
70.5%
in 2019
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
151st
Jordan rank
152nd
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Jordan
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 71.7% against 70.5% in Jordan, a difference of 1.2%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 151st and Jordan ranks 152nd of 188 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.0% | 90.9% | 27.9% | Jordan |
| 2010s | 65.5% | 77.4% | 11.9% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Jordan?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 71.7% against 70.5% in Jordan as of 2015.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Jordan?
- 1.2%, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Jordan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Jordan rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 151st and Jordan ranks 152nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.