Dominican Republic vs Timor-Leste: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Dominican Republic
92.0%
in 2019
Timor-Leste
93.3%
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
111th
Timor-Leste rank
108th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Dominican Republic
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 93.3% against 92.0% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 111th and Timor-Leste ranks 108th of 188 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.6% | 68.4% | 19.2% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 88.6% | 80.6% | 7.9% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Dominican Republic or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 93.3% against 92.0% in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Dominican Republic and Timor-Leste?
- 1.3%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Timor-Leste?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Timor-Leste rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Dominican Republic ranks 111th and Timor-Leste ranks 108th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.