East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Peru: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 114.3% against 93.8% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 20.5%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 21st and Peru ranks 24th of 45 groups.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 78.7% | 87.6% | 8.9% | Peru |
| 2000s | 86.9% | 94.0% | 7.1% | Peru |
| 2010s | 90.8% | 108.3% | 17.5% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Peru?
- Peru, at 114.3% against 93.8% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Peru?
- 20.5%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Peru?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Peru rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 21st and Peru ranks 24th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.