East Asia & Pacific vs Portugal: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
East Asia & Pacific
94.2%
in 2019
Portugal
118.3%
in 2018
East Asia & Pacific rank
19th
Portugal rank
19th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 118.3% against 94.2% in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 24.1%.
That makes Portugal's figure about 1.3 times East Asia & Pacific's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 19th and Portugal ranks 19th of 45 groups.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 78.3% | 110.7% | 32.4% | Portugal |
| 2000s | 87.8% | 113.8% | 25.9% | Portugal |
| 2010s | 91.5% | 118.0% | 26.4% | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, East Asia & Pacific or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 118.3% against 94.2% in East Asia & Pacific as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between East Asia & Pacific and Portugal?
- 24.1%, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Portugal?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2018.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Portugal rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 19th and Portugal ranks 19th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.