Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Tunisia: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 105.9% against 53.4% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 52.5%.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 2.0 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 44th of 45 groups.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30.4% | 82.5% | 52.2% | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 40.2% | 108.1% | 68.0% | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 52.0% | 107.7% | 55.7% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 105.9% against 53.4% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tunisia?
- 52.5%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tunisia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tunisia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 44th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.