Iraq vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Iraq
76.7%
in 2007
Lao People's Democratic Republic
77.0%
in 2019
Iraq rank
144th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
143rd
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Iraq
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 77.0% against 76.7% in Iraq, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 144th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 143rd of 188 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 55.2% | 50.0% | 5.2% | Iraq |
| 2000s | 68.9% | 56.7% | 12.3% | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Iraq or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 77.0% against 76.7% in Iraq as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Iraq and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 0.3%, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2007.
- How do Iraq and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Iraq ranks 144th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 143rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.