Latin America & Caribbean vs Uruguay: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 124.9% against 107.6% in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 17.3%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Latin America & Caribbean's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Latin America & Caribbean ahead.
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 6th of 45 groups.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latin America & Caribbean | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 95.2% | 95.9% | 0.7% | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 97.9% | 106.0% | 8.1% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 105.0% | 119.1% | 14.2% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Latin America & Caribbean or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 124.9% against 107.6% in Latin America & Caribbean as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Latin America & Caribbean and Uruguay?
- 17.3%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean and Uruguay?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
- How do Latin America & Caribbean and Uruguay rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Latin America & Caribbean ranks 3rd and Uruguay ranks 6th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.