Least developed countries vs Lithuania: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Least developed countries
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 107.7% against 57.9% in Least developed countries, a difference of 49.8%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.9 times Least developed countries's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Least developed countries ranks 37th and Lithuania ranks 36th of 43 groups.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Least developed countries | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.0% | 90.4% | 53.5% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 44.2% | 105.4% | 61.3% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 55.2% | 106.4% | 51.1% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Least developed countries or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 107.7% against 57.9% in Least developed countries as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Least developed countries and Lithuania?
- 49.8%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Lithuania?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2018.
- How do Least developed countries and Lithuania rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Least developed countries ranks 37th and Lithuania ranks 36th of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.