Netherlands vs OECD members: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Netherlands
135.4%
in 2018
OECD members
106.8%
in 2019
Netherlands rank
4th
OECD members rank
5th
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Netherlands
- OECD members
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 135.4% against 106.8% in OECD members, a difference of 28.6%.
That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.3 times OECD members's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.
Netherlands ranks 4th and OECD members ranks 5th of 188 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | OECD members | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 141.8% | 97.7% | 44.1% | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 133.6% | 102.2% | 31.5% | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 135.3% | 105.9% | 29.4% | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Netherlands or OECD members?
- Netherlands, at 135.4% against 106.8% in OECD members as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Netherlands and OECD members?
- 28.6%, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and OECD members?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2018.
- How do Netherlands and OECD members rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Netherlands ranks 4th and OECD members ranks 5th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.