Post-demographic dividend vs Thailand: Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male
Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male over time
- Post-demographic dividend
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 124.5% against 103.5% in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 21.0%.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.2 times Post-demographic dividend's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Post-demographic dividend ahead.
Post-demographic dividend ranks 8th and Thailand ranks 7th of 45 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Post-demographic dividend averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Post-demographic dividend | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 103.3% | 86.8% | 16.5% | Post-demographic dividend |
| 2010s | 104.2% | 113.4% | 9.2% | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male, Post-demographic dividend or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 124.5% against 103.5% in Post-demographic dividend as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male between Post-demographic dividend and Thailand?
- 21.0%, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Post-demographic dividend and Thailand?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
- How do Post-demographic dividend and Thailand rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male?
- Post-demographic dividend ranks 8th and Thailand ranks 7th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.