AIMS: Central Asia vs New Zealand: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes
AIMS: Central Asia
96.2%
in 2024
New Zealand
98.8%
in 2024
AIMS: Central Asia rank
108th
New Zealand rank
105th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 98.8% against 96.2% in AIMS: Central Asia, a difference of 2.6%.
Across all 25 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 108th and New Zealand ranks 105th of 221 groups.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.2% | 100.9% | 5.8% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 95.3% | 100.1% | 4.7% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 95.1% | 99.1% | 4.0% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes, AIMS: Central Asia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 98.8% against 96.2% in AIMS: Central Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes between AIMS: Central Asia and New Zealand?
- 2.6%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and New Zealand?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and New Zealand rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 108th and New Zealand ranks 105th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release