AIMS: South and West Asia vs Libya: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes
AIMS: South and West Asia
100.8%
in 2024
Libya
105.6%
in 2006
AIMS: South and West Asia rank
45th
Libya rank
42nd
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes over time
- AIMS: South and West Asia
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 105.6% against 100.8% in AIMS: South and West Asia, a difference of 4.8%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
AIMS: South and West Asia ranks 45th and Libya ranks 42nd of 221 groups.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes, AIMS: South and West Asia or Libya?
- Libya, at 105.6% against 100.8% in AIMS: South and West Asia as of 2006.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes between AIMS: South and West Asia and Libya?
- 4.8%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: South and West Asia and Libya?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2006.
- How do AIMS: South and West Asia and Libya rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes?
- AIMS: South and West Asia ranks 45th and Libya ranks 42nd of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release