AIMS: Central Asia vs Iceland: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
AIMS: Central Asia
95.3%
in 2024
Iceland
98.2%
in 2023
AIMS: Central Asia rank
109th
Iceland rank
110th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 98.2% against 95.3% in AIMS: Central Asia, a difference of 2.9%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 109th and Iceland ranks 110th of 221 groups.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 87.7% | 98.8% | 11.2% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 93.1% | 98.5% | 5.4% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 94.4% | 98.8% | 4.3% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 94.0% | 98.4% | 4.5% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, AIMS: Central Asia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 98.2% against 95.3% in AIMS: Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between AIMS: Central Asia and Iceland?
- 2.9%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and Iceland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and Iceland rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 109th and Iceland ranks 110th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release