AIMS: Central Asia vs Naoero: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
AIMS: Central Asia
95.3%
in 2024
Naoero
98.5%
in 2025
AIMS: Central Asia rank
109th
Naoero rank
106th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- AIMS: Central Asia
- Naoero
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 98.5% against 95.3% in AIMS: Central Asia, a difference of 3.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1998 it was AIMS: Central Asia ahead.
AIMS: Central Asia ranks 109th and Naoero ranks 106th of 221 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, AIMS: Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and Naoero in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Central Asia | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 87.8% | 85.9% | 1.9% | AIMS: Central Asia |
| 2000s | 93.2% | 83.2% | 10.0% | AIMS: Central Asia |
| 2010s | 94.5% | 98.4% | 3.9% | Naoero |
| 2020s | 94.5% | 102.5% | 8.0% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, AIMS: Central Asia or Naoero?
- Naoero, at 98.5% against 95.3% in AIMS: Central Asia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between AIMS: Central Asia and Naoero?
- 3.2%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Central Asia and Naoero?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Central Asia and Naoero rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- AIMS: Central Asia ranks 109th and Naoero ranks 106th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release