AIMS: East Asia vs Australia: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
AIMS: East Asia
99.3%
in 2024
Australia
102.3%
in 2024
AIMS: East Asia rank
66th
Australia rank
69th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- AIMS: East Asia
- Australia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 102.3% against 99.3% in AIMS: East Asia, a difference of 3.0%.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
AIMS: East Asia ranks 66th and Australia ranks 69th of 221 groups.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: East Asia | Australia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 98.6% | 105.3% | 6.7% | Australia |
| 2020s | 99.0% | 102.6% | 3.6% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, AIMS: East Asia or Australia?
- Australia, at 102.3% against 99.3% in AIMS: East Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between AIMS: East Asia and Australia?
- 3.0%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: East Asia and Australia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: East Asia and Australia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- AIMS: East Asia ranks 66th and Australia ranks 69th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release