AIMS: Pacific vs Latvia: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
AIMS: Pacific
96.2%
in 2024
Latvia
98.7%
in 2024
AIMS: Pacific rank
102nd
Latvia rank
102nd
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 98.7% against 96.2% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 2.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was AIMS: Pacific ahead.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 102nd and Latvia ranks 102nd of 221 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.2% | 101.5% | 5.3% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 100.9% | 101.1% | 0.2% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 96.7% | 99.6% | 2.9% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, AIMS: Pacific or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 98.7% against 96.2% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between AIMS: Pacific and Latvia?
- 2.5%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and Latvia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 102nd and Latvia ranks 102nd of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release