AIMS: Pacific vs New Zealand: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
AIMS: Pacific
96.2%
in 2024
New Zealand
98.8%
in 2024
AIMS: Pacific rank
102nd
New Zealand rank
101st
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- AIMS: Pacific
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 98.8% against 96.2% in AIMS: Pacific, a difference of 2.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.
AIMS: Pacific ranks 102nd and New Zealand ranks 101st of 221 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, AIMS: Pacific averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AIMS: Pacific | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.3% | 100.6% | 4.3% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 100.9% | 100.0% | 0.9% | AIMS: Pacific |
| 2020s | 96.7% | 99.2% | 2.5% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, AIMS: Pacific or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 98.8% against 96.2% in AIMS: Pacific as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between AIMS: Pacific and New Zealand?
- 2.6%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AIMS: Pacific and New Zealand?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do AIMS: Pacific and New Zealand rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- AIMS: Pacific ranks 102nd and New Zealand ranks 101st of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release