Belarus vs UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female

Belarus
95.5%
in 2024
UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries
90.4%
in 2024
Belarus rank
137th
UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries rank
140th

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time

  • Belarus
  • UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries
0255075100125199420092024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 95.5% against 90.4% in UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries, a difference of 5.1%.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 137th and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries ranks 140th of 199 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries Difference Ahead
1990s 95.8% 78.3% 17.5% Belarus
2000s 108.4% 85.8% 22.6% Belarus
2010s 99.4% 88.3% 11.1% Belarus
2020s 95.9% 89.3% 6.6% Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, Belarus or UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries?
Belarus, at 95.5% against 90.4% in UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between Belarus and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries?
5.1%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries?
31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Belarus and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
Belarus ranks 137th and UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries ranks 140th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/belarus/unicef-middle-east-and-north-africa-programme-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/belarus/unicef-middle-east-and-north-africa-programme-countries/">Belarus vs UNICEF: Middle East and North Africa Programme Countries: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,310 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release