Congo vs ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female

Congo
92.2%
in 2012
ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
87.8%
in 2024
Congo rank
152nd
ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) rank
151st

Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time

  • Congo
  • ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)
020406080100199420092024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 92.2% against 87.8% in ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119), a difference of 4.4%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 152nd and ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ranks 151st of 199 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) Difference Ahead
1990s 66.2% 60.4% 5.8% Congo
2000s 75.8% 66.6% 9.2% Congo
2010s 92.2% 83.1% 9.2% Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, Congo or ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)?
Congo, at 92.2% against 87.8% in ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) as of 2012.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between Congo and ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)?
4.4%, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119)?
9 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2012.
How do Congo and ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
Congo ranks 152nd and ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119) ranks 151st of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/congo-rep/eca-mineral-rich-countries-unsdcode-98119/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://education.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-primary-and-lower-secondary-female-percent-2/congo-rep/eca-mineral-rich-countries-unsdcode-98119/">Congo vs ECA: Mineral-rich Countries (unsdcode:98119): Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO (UNESCO Institute for Statistics)
Coverage
420 places, 10,310 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

February 2026 Data Release