Congo vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
Congo
92.2%
in 2012
Zimbabwe
92.5%
in 2013
Congo rank
152nd
Zimbabwe rank
150th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 92.5% against 92.2% in Congo, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 152nd and Zimbabwe ranks 150th of 199 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44.7% | 94.4% | 49.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 71.7% | 99.7% | 27.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 92.2% | 93.8% | 1.6% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 92.5% against 92.2% in Congo as of 2013.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 0.3%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2012.
- How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- Congo ranks 152nd and Zimbabwe ranks 150th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release