ECA: Eccas (unsdcode:98107) vs Zimbabwe: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female
ECA: Eccas (unsdcode:98107)
89.4%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
92.5%
in 2013
ECA: Eccas (unsdcode:98107) rank
144th
Zimbabwe rank
150th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female over time
- ECA: Eccas (unsdcode:98107)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 92.5% against 89.4% in ECA: Eccas (unsdcode:98107), a difference of 3.1%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
ECA: Eccas (unsdcode:98107) ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 150th of 221 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ECA: Eccas (unsdcode:98107) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.9% | 94.4% | 46.6% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 54.3% | 99.7% | 45.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 83.1% | 93.1% | 10.1% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female, ECA: Eccas (unsdcode:98107) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 92.5% against 89.4% in ECA: Eccas (unsdcode:98107) as of 2013.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female between ECA: Eccas (unsdcode:98107) and Zimbabwe?
- 3.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ECA: Eccas (unsdcode:98107) and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2013.
- How do ECA: Eccas (unsdcode:98107) and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female?
- ECA: Eccas (unsdcode:98107) ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 150th of 221 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
February 2026 Data Release